Dario Amodei said it seemed likely to him that AI systems will first speed up human productivity, then equal it, and at some point become in some meaningful sense the main contributor to scientific progress, though he expected the details to be different from what people expect.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
Open-ended prediction with no horizon about eventual AI dominance in science.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “Dario Amodei said it seemed likely to him that AI systems will first speed up human productivity, then equal it, and at some point become in some meaningful sense the main contributor to scientific progress, though he expected the details to be different from what people expect.” (said 8 August 2023). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_bbe30f737c80, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_bbe30f737c80
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Dario Amodei
-
Mostly false
“We believe AI for biology is on a similar exponential trend.”
-
Resolved true
“for coding, we're going to see very serious things by the end of 2025,”
By the end of 2025, AI will do very serious things in coding.
-
Resolved false
“But I would guess that in another 10 months, we’ll probably get pretty close. We’ll be at least 90%.”
-
Mostly false
“in 10 months we’ve gone from 3% to 50% on this task. And I think in another year we’ll probably be at 90%.”
-
Mostly true
“I would guess a year from now, the models can do this very, very reliably.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.