ClaimsDario Amodei

“But I would guess that in another 10 months, we’ll probably get pretty close. We’ll be at least 90%.”

Dario Amodei, Anthropic CEO, interviewee 11 November 2024 Transcript for Dario Amodei: Anthropic CEO on Claude, AGI & the Future of AI & Humanity (Lex Fridman Podcast)

Prediction AI capabilities

Amodei guessed that within about 10 months AI models would probably get pretty close on typical real-world programming tasks, reaching at least 90%.

Resolved false The record shows it did not happen or was not so.

Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?

What would count as true or false

In context, the measure of 'typical real-world programming tasks' is SWE-bench Verified (or the SWE-bench variant he discussed). The deadline is September 2025, about 10 months after 11 November 2024. TRUE: by 30 September 2025, an AI model or agent system has a published or officially verified score of 90% or more on SWE-bench Verified (lab announcement, the official SWE-bench leaderboard or a model system card). MOSTLY TRUE: a score of 90% or more is reached by the deadline, but only under a minor qualifier the claim did not depend on, such as an extensive-sampling or parallel-compute setting reported by the lab. MOSTLY FALSE: the best score by the deadline is between 88.2% and just under 90% (within 2% of the bound), or 90% is reached only after September 2025. FALSE: the best score by 30 September 2025 is below 88.2%.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (6)

  1. E1 Why we no longer evaluate SWE-bench Verified OpenAI · 23 February 2026

    “from 74.9% to 80.9% in the last 6 months”
  2. E2 Why SWE-bench Verified no longer measures frontier coding capabilities OpenAI · 23 February 2026

    “After initial leaps, state-of-the-art progress on SWE-bench Verified has slowed, improving(opens in a new window) from 74.9% to 80.9% in the last 6 months.”
  3. E3 Introducing Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic · 29 September 2025 Own record

    “We report 77.2%, which was averaged over 10 trials, no test-time compute, and 200K thinking budget on the full 500-problem SWE-bench Verified dataset.”
  4. E4 Introducing Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic · 29 September 2025 Own record

    “This results in a score of 82.0% for Sonnet 4.5.”
  5. E5 Claude Sonnet 4.5: Best coding model or just more marketing? R&D World · 30 September 2025

    “In terms of claimed benchmarks, Sonnet 4.5 leads Anthropic’s own chart on SWE-bench Verified (n=500), posting 77.2% accuracy in standard runs and 82.0% with parallel test-time compute (the asterisked figure).”
  6. E6 Introducing GPT-5 for developers OpenAI · 7 August 2025

    “GPT‑5 is state-of-the-art (SOTA) across key coding benchmarks, scoring 74.9% on SWE-bench Verified and 88% on Aider polyglot.”

Reasoning

An OpenAI review from February 2026 says state-of-the-art progress on SWE-bench Verified slowed, rising only from 74.9% to 80.9% over the previous six months (E1, E2). None of the reported scores reaches or comes near 90% by September 2025. OpenAI puts state-of-the-art progress at 74.9% rising to 80.9% in the six months before February 2026 [E2], and Anthropic's highest reported figure for Sonnet 4.5 in September 2025 is 82.0% [E4]. Near the deadline, the top reported figures were GPT-5 at 74.9% (E6) and Claude Sonnet 4.5 at 77.2% in standard runs. Sonnet 4.5 reached 82.0% only with parallel test-time compute (E3, E4, E5). The best score by 30 September 2025 was well below the 88.2% threshold, so the claim resolves false.

Cite this claim

Dario Amodei, “Amodei guessed that within about 10 months AI models would probably get pretty close on typical real-world programming tasks, reaching at least 90%.” (said 11 November 2024). Verdict: resolved false. Reliability API, claim c_775bda437f17, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_775bda437f17

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Dario Amodei, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More prediction claims by Dario Amodei

  1. Mostly false Prediction 23 September 2026
    “We believe AI for biology is on a similar exponential trend.”

    Amodei said that "we" believe AI for biology is on an exponential trend similar to the one he described for AI in mathematics.

  2. Resolved true Prediction 28 February 2025
    “for coding, we're going to see very serious things by the end of 2025,”

    By the end of 2025, AI will do very serious things in coding.

  3. Mostly false Prediction 11 November 2024
    “in 10 months we’ve gone from 3% to 50% on this task. And I think in another year we’ll probably be at 90%.”

    Amodei said that, after progress from 3% to 50% on SWE-bench in 10 months, state-of-the-art models would probably be at about 90% in another year, while adding that he did not know and it might be less.

  4. Mostly true Prediction 11 November 2024
    “I would guess a year from now, the models can do this very, very reliably.”

    Amodei guessed that by about November 2025, AI models would be able to perform computer-use tasks very, very reliably.

  5. Mostly true Prediction 28 February 2026
    “We're gonna be fine. The-- the impact of this designation is fairly small.”

    Anthropic will be fine, and the impact of the supply chain risk designation on it will be fairly small.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.