Taleb said he had posted a lot of things online and organized the book based on the excitement the chapters brought, adding "Of course, not 100%."
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
His writing process and organizing motives are internal and known only to him.
Cite this claim
Nassim Taleb, “Taleb said he had posted a lot of things online and organized the book based on the excitement the chapters brought, adding "Of course, not 100%."” (said 10 July 2017). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_b82804da204c, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_b82804da204c
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Nassim Taleb
-
Mostly true
“adds 3 chapters and an appendix on Max Entropy distributions (includes Tsallis Entropy).”
-
Resolved true
“Just to remind people that I have NOTHING to do with "nassimtaleb. org"”
Nassim Taleb has no connection to the website "nassimtaleb.org".
-
Resolved true
“We respond to Tetlock et al. (2022) showing 1)”
-
Resolved true
“I am writing these lines from the vantage point of my specialty of decision making under uncertainty, not that of theology”
The author's specialty is decision making under uncertainty, not theology.
-
Mostly true
“This part in Fooled by Randomness was inspired by the psychology of depositors in #Lebanon who enjoyed steady AND high returns.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.