Developments connected to machine learning will cause massive inequality, with owners of capital and highly skilled labor winning while everybody else loses.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
Open-ended prediction with no deadline and vague terms ('massive inequality'), so it can't be definitively tested.
Cite this claim
Nouriel Roubini, “Developments connected to machine learning will cause massive inequality, with owners of capital and highly skilled labor winning while everybody else loses.” (said 6 November 2022). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_b02c75f91b5f, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_b02c75f91b5f
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Nouriel Roubini
-
Resolved false
“In a note to my clients this week I made a wide out-of-consensus call that the RN - Le Pen’s party - will win an absolute majority in the current French parliamentary elections (60% probability for…”
-
Mostly false
“As I predicted in early September in an interview with Bloomberg”
US stocks could see a 10% correction (predicted in a Bloomberg interview in early September 2023).
-
Mostly false
“They are talking tough [but if] faced with a debt crisis and an economic crisis, they’re going to wimp out.”
-
Resolved true
“China’s not going to take lightly this attempt at full technological and economic containment.”
-
Resolved false
“So it’s much worse than the ‘70s, and it’s probably as bad as during the GFC.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.