For most of human history people were trying to survive against violent predators and similar threats, and the average lifespan was 40 years.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
Judge against historical and demographic research on human life expectancy and causes of death. True: the evidence shows that for most of human history average life expectancy at birth was about 40 years, and that predators and violence were a major survival challenge. Mostly true: the lifespan figure is roughly right (about 30–40 at birth) and the predator point is a minor overstatement. Mixed: one part holds and the other does not. Mostly false: the claim distorts something true, e.g. low life expectancy at birth (often about 25–35, driven by infant mortality) presented as people typically dying at 40, or predators presented as the main threat when disease and starvation dominated. False: the evidence contradicts both parts outright.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 Demographic perspectives on the rise of longevity - PMC PubMed Central (PNAS review, Bergeron-Boucher et al.) · 10 February 2021
“Various estimates indicate a life expectancy at birth of less than 40 y for these populations (41).”
-
E2 Demographic perspectives on the rise of longevity - PMC PubMed Central (PNAS review, Bergeron-Boucher et al.) · 10 February 2021
“Hence, it can be concluded that human life expectancy before 1840 generally fell below 40, and in situations of famine, epidemic, or war, the value could be much lower.”
-
E3 Misperceiving Life Expectancy in the Deep Past Sapiens (republished from The Conversation) · 14 September 2022
“What some people don’t realize is that low life expectancy at birth for any population usually reflects very high rates of infant mortality.”
-
E4 The prehistoric psychopath - Works in Progress Magazine Works in Progress · 13 March 2025
“Analysis indicates that prehistoric hunter gatherers were considerably less violent than is commonly believed.”
Reasoning
E1 and E2 show life expectancy at birth was generally below 40 and E3 links low figures to infant mortality, but no evidence addresses predators or the relative weight of disease and starvation; E4 concerns violence between humans only. The evidence therefore does not settle the predator part of the claim under the criteria.
Cite this claim
Nate Silver, “For most of human history people were trying to survive against violent predators and similar threats, and the average lifespan was 40 years.” (said 13 August 2024). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_abbce2355a25, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_abbce2355a25
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Nate Silver
-
Mostly true
“If anything, there was too little panic from Team Blue about 2016, which was dismissive of polls showing a tightening race down the stretch run and a tenuous Hillary Clinton lead in the Electoral…”
-
Mostly true
“Ever since I’ve been covering elections in 2008, Democrats have been prone to bouts of panic about the state of the horse race.”
-
Mostly true
“People have been trained for thousands of years, more than thousands—hundreds of thousands of years—in an environment where there was no abundance.”
Humans evolved over hundreds of thousands of years in an environment without abundance.
-
Mostly true
“He's actually not a DSA guy, but sort of a more left populist.”
Abdul El-Sayed is not a DSA guy but is sort of a more left populist.
-
Mostly true
“Jocelyn Benson’s lead in the Michigan gubernatorial polls is about 4.2 points larger than Abdul El-Sayed’s in the state’s Senate contest”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.