In Dario Amodei's view, AI models would keep getting better across the board; he said he did not see any area where the models were very weak or not starting to make progress.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
Open-ended 'across the board, no area' prediction with no horizon.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “In Dario Amodei's view, AI models would keep getting better across the board; he said he did not see any area where the models were very weak or not starting to make progress.” (said 8 August 2023). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_abbb72336b68, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_abbb72336b68
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Dario Amodei
-
Mostly false
“We believe AI for biology is on a similar exponential trend.”
-
Resolved true
“for coding, we're going to see very serious things by the end of 2025,”
By the end of 2025, AI will do very serious things in coding.
-
Resolved false
“But I would guess that in another 10 months, we’ll probably get pretty close. We’ll be at least 90%.”
-
Mostly false
“in 10 months we’ve gone from 3% to 50% on this task. And I think in another year we’ll probably be at 90%.”
-
Mostly true
“I would guess a year from now, the models can do this very, very reliably.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.