Burry said that, absent a new asset bubble, 2001-era US common stock valuations appeared to promise future returns well below those still expected by the investing public.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
Test: over roughly the next decade from 2001–2002, were US stock returns well below what the investing public then expected? Compare the S&P 500 annualised total return (about 2002–2012) with investor return expectations reported at the time (for example Gallup/UBS or similar surveys, often around 10% a year or more). True: realised returns were well below expectations (several percentage points a year lower). Mostly true: returns were clearly below expectations, but by a smaller margin. Mixed: they were below over some reasonable horizons and not others. Mostly false: they were only slightly below expectations. False: they matched or exceeded expectations. A new asset bubble that lifted returns is the claim's own exception; note it if relevant.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 The Leftovers of Irrational Exuberance Gallup · 2 September 2003
“Our results show that on average, American investors expect a 14.3% return on equity investments, more than twice what the experts project.”
-
E2 Are Equity Returns Worth the Risks? Gallup · 20 August 2002
“In July 2001, investors said the stock market would provide them with an annual average rate of return of 9.1% over the next 12 months.”
-
E3 It's Not Really A Lost Decade Forbes (Advisor Network contributor Kevin Mahn, Hennion & Walsh Asset Management) · 13 September 2010
“When dividends are factored in, the results do not get much better as annualized total return for the S&P 500 index (with dividends reinvested back into the index) over the same timeframe was -0.95%.”
-
E4 S&P 500 Returns by Decade: The 10% Average Almost No One Actually Lived Through · Finlume Finlume · 15 June 2026
“The 2000s — often called the “lost decade” — delivered roughly -0.9% per year in nominal total return, dragged down by the dot-com crash (2000-2002) and the 2008 financial crisis.”
Reasoning
The evidence shows investor expectations of 9.1% to 14.3% a year (E1, E2) and an S&P 500 total return of about -0.9% a year for the 2000s decade (E4). That figure includes the 2000–2002 crash, which came before the prediction. E3 does not state its period. No evidence item gives returns for the criteria's window of about 2002–2012.
Cite this claim
Michael Burry, “Burry said that, absent a new asset bubble, 2001-era US common stock valuations appeared to promise future returns well below those still expected by the investing public.” (said 2002). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_aa274017c5b6, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_aa274017c5b6
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Michael Burry
-
Mostly false
“All personal income taxes collected in a year do not so much as add up to $1 trillion dollars, and yet by 2020 interest expense on our national debt alone could exceed $1 trillion.”
US interest expense on the national debt alone could exceed $1 trillion by 2020.
-
Resolved true
“Today, I expect the US government to attempt to continue easy money policies into the next presidential term”
-
Mixed
“I imagine the shares of these companies, in most cases, will become very boring before they become attractive again.”
-
Mostly true
“Less leverage and lower returns on assets are now in the cards.”
Less leverage and lower returns on assets are now likely for financial institutions.
-
Resolved true
“The S&P 500 could easily finish the year in the negative, dragging many investment funds – too many of which are crowded into the same “value-but-for-a-dire-economy” trades – down with it.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.