There is no evidence for the theory under discussion, and even if it were true, it would only delay replicating brain function by a decade or two.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
Refers to an unspecified theory so its terms are undefined.
Cite this claim
Ray Kurzweil, “There is no evidence for the theory under discussion, and even if it were true, it would only delay replicating brain function by a decade or two.” (said 2001). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_8ba7fb736bcf, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_8ba7fb736bcf
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ray Kurzweil
-
Mostly false
“Right now, you’re getting back about four months a year.”
Currently scientific progress gives back about four months of life expectancy per year.
-
Mostly false
“And then AlphaFold 2 in 2022 went through 200 million proteins and got the shape exactly correct, and that’s going to help come up with new medications.”
-
Resolved true
“As of two or three years ago, we had gone through 170,000 proteins.”
As of two or three years ago, 170,000 proteins had been worked through by people.
-
Mixed
“The current method for testing these few treatments is to organize a few hundred human subjects and then test them over about a year and a half, at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars.”
-
Mostly true
“Very often, the first several solutions tested on humans are not ideal and lead to other solutions that also take a few years to develop and test.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.