The ultimate AI systems will have the memory capabilities of machines rather than of people.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
'Ultimate AI systems' has no horizon and cannot be tested.
Cite this claim
Gary Marcus, “The ultimate AI systems will have the memory capabilities of machines rather than of people.” (said 20 September 2019). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_63152aa8a98d, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_63152aa8a98d
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Gary Marcus
-
Mostly true
“Some of its advice will be head-scratchingly bad.”
-
Mostly true
“GPT-5 will surely be better, a lot better than GPT-4.”
-
Resolved true
“GPT-5 really is about to drop, no foolin’.”
-
Resolved true
“It will still make a significant number of shake-your-head stupid errors, in ways that are hard to fully predict.”
GPT-5 will still make a significant number of obvious errors that are hard to predict.
-
Mostly true
“Neurosymbolic AI will become much more prominent.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.