There are some questions, such as the definition of life in abortion decisions, on which humans will never agree.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
'Never agree' is an unbounded prediction that cannot be settled.
Cite this claim
Gary Marcus, “There are some questions, such as the definition of life in abortion decisions, on which humans will never agree.” (said 2025). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_5eb317afc64d, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_5eb317afc64d
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Gary Marcus
-
Mostly true
“Some of its advice will be head-scratchingly bad.”
-
Mostly true
“GPT-5 will surely be better, a lot better than GPT-4.”
-
Resolved true
“GPT-5 really is about to drop, no foolin’.”
-
Resolved true
“It will still make a significant number of shake-your-head stupid errors, in ways that are hard to fully predict.”
GPT-5 will still make a significant number of obvious errors that are hard to predict.
-
Resolved true
“Guardrails (a la ChatGPT) may be in place, but the guardrails will teeter between being too weak (beaten by “jailbreaks”) and too strong (rejecting some perfectly reasonable requests).”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.