In early August 2023 Gary Marcus wrote a piece titled 'What if Generative AI turned out to be a Dud', which was picked up by the Financial Times and other outlets.
Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
True: Marcus published a piece titled 'What if Generative AI turned out to be a Dud' (wording may differ slightly) in early August 2023 (roughly 1–15 August), and the Financial Times plus at least one other outlet referred to or covered it. Mostly true: everything holds except a small slip, such as publication a few days after mid-August, a slightly different title, or FT coverage but only thin evidence of other outlets. Mixed: the piece existed in August 2023 but the Financial Times did not pick it up (only other outlets did), or the FT pickup is confirmed but the date is well off. Mostly false: a similar piece exists but in a different month or year, and it was not picked up by the FT. False: no such piece by Marcus exists.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (5)
-
E1 What if Generative AI turned out to be a Dud? Marcus on AI (Substack, Gary Marcus) · 13 August 2023 Own record
“With the possible exception of the quick to rise and quick to fall alleged room-temperature superconductor LK-99, few things I have ever seen have been more hyped than generative AI.”
-
E2 Is Generative AI a dud? – Innospective Innospective · 29 August 2023
“AI luminaries such as Gary Marcus and François Chollet as well as respected industry analysts such as Ben Evans are openly postulating that Gen AI might not be the civilization-changing, business-disrupting force that it was supposed to be.”
-
E3 What if Generative AI turned out to be a Dud? Marcus on AI (Substack, Gary Marcus) · 13 August 2023 Own record
“What if Generative AI turned out to be a Dud?<br>Gary Marcus<br>Aug 13, 2023”
-
E4 Artificial Intelligence in Business: What if AI is Overhyped? Forcepoint · 15 August 2023
“Over the weekend, one article got me thinking: the one where Gary Marcus asks the question: What if Generative AI turned out to be a dud?”
-
E5 The Rise and Fall of ChatGPT? Marcus on AI (Substack, Gary Marcus) · 24 August 2023 Own record
“A few days earlier Financial Times columnist John Thornhill quoted this very newsletter, concluding with a zinger:”
Reasoning
Marcus's Substack shows a post titled 'What if Generative AI turned out to be a Dud?' dated Aug 13, 2023, which is within the early-August window (E1, E3). Independent outlets picked it up within weeks: Forcepoint quotes the article by title (E4), and Innospective cites Marcus as questioning generative AI (E2). The only evidence for the Financial Times pickup is Marcus's own later post, which says FT columnist John Thornhill quoted "this very newsletter" (E5). That account is specific and dated, but no independent source confirms it, so the FT part rests on weaker evidence than the rest of the claim.
Cite this claim
Gary Marcus, “In early August 2023 Gary Marcus wrote a piece titled 'What if Generative AI turned out to be a Dud', which was picked up by the Financial Times and other outlets.” (said 31 March 2024). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_584ed4c945da, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_584ed4c945da
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Gary Marcus
-
Resolved true
“For years I have been warning that “scaling” — eeking out improvements in AI by adding more data and more compute, without making fundamental architectural changes — would not continue forever.”
-
Resolved true
“Immediately after the February announcement of Sora, I noted Sora’s troubles with physics and predicted that they wouldn’t go away. They haven’t.”
-
Mostly true
“So it was heartening to see many of the ideas that I have been pushing for a long time, including a CERN for AI and Global AI governance (which I emphasized in April in my TED talk and in The…”
-
Resolved true
“It actually called for *more* research.”
-
Resolved true
“The letter didn't call for a ban on AI. It didn't call for a permanent ban.”
The FLI open letter did not call for a ban on AI or for a permanent ban.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.