If a pause in AI development of one year were needed in 2027, it would be feasible.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
deadline 2027 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “If a pause in AI development of one year were needed in 2027, it would be feasible.” (said 12 April 2024). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_45003a6a14e9, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_45003a6a14e9
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Dario Amodei
-
Mostly true
“We're gonna be fine. The-- the impact of this designation is fairly small.”
-
Resolved true
“Probably the export controls may even have, you know, the impact of stimulating China.”
US export controls may have the effect of stimulating China's chip development.
-
Mostly true
“AI seems likely to enable much better propaganda and surveillance, both major tools in the autocrat’s toolkit.”
-
Mostly false
“We believe AI for biology is on a similar exponential trend.”
-
Resolved false
“where AI is writing 90 percent of the code”
Within three to six months of March 2025, AI will be writing 90 percent of code.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.