Trustworthy AI will need genuinely new architectures incorporating explicit knowledge and world models at their core.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
A prediction about what trustworthy AI will need has no horizon and is not testable.
Cite this claim
Gary Marcus, “Trustworthy AI will need genuinely new architectures incorporating explicit knowledge and world models at their core.” (said 25 December 2022). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_428bfa99029d, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_428bfa99029d
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Gary Marcus
-
Mostly true
“Some of its advice will be head-scratchingly bad.”
-
Mostly true
“GPT-5 will surely be better, a lot better than GPT-4.”
-
Resolved true
“GPT-5 really is about to drop, no foolin’.”
-
Resolved true
“It will still make a significant number of shake-your-head stupid errors, in ways that are hard to fully predict.”
GPT-5 will still make a significant number of obvious errors that are hard to predict.
-
Mostly true
“Neurosymbolic AI will become much more prominent.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.