Scott Alexander said he already expects this post will be used as convenient material to fling at the Blue Tribe.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
Prediction about how a post will be used has no horizon and is vague.
Cite this claim
Scott Alexander, “Scott Alexander said he already expects this post will be used as convenient material to fling at the Blue Tribe.” (said 30 September 2014). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_41fdbb20c6d0, method 0.1.0+8bea457b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_41fdbb20c6d0
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Scott Alexander
-
Resolved true
“I actually remember and grade these predictions publicly sometime in the year 2023: 90%”
-
Mostly true
“Our scenario focuses on coding in particular because we think coding is what starts the intelligence explosion.”
The authors of the scenario think coding is what will start the intelligence explosion.
-
Mostly true
“We expect that as the AI labs become more capable, they tell the government about this because they want government contracts, they want government support.”
-
Mostly true
“In our scenario, that starts with cyber warfare, the government sees that these AIs are now as capable as the best human hackers, but can be deployed at humongous scale.”
-
Resolved true
“So they become extremely interested and they discuss nationalizing the AI companies.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.