Amodei expects that the same training techniques used for code, image input and voice will scale to this area, which the conversation describes as giving Claude the power of action.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
The prediction has no horizon and is too vague to test.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “Amodei expects that the same training techniques used for code, image input and voice will scale to this area, which the conversation describes as giving Claude the power of action.” (said 11 November 2024). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_404a82a95b99, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_404a82a95b99
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Dario Amodei
-
Mostly false
“We believe AI for biology is on a similar exponential trend.”
-
Resolved true
“for coding, we're going to see very serious things by the end of 2025,”
By the end of 2025, AI will do very serious things in coding.
-
Resolved false
“But I would guess that in another 10 months, we’ll probably get pretty close. We’ll be at least 90%.”
-
Mostly false
“in 10 months we’ve gone from 3% to 50% on this task. And I think in another year we’ll probably be at 90%.”
-
Mostly true
“I would guess a year from now, the models can do this very, very reliably.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.