ClaimsGary Marcus

“I wrote a long tweet about it this morning”

Gary Marcus, Substack author 30 March 2023 The Open Letter Controversy (Marcus on AI) archived copy

Factual Their own work or organisation

Gary Marcus wrote a long Twitter thread on the morning of 2023-03-30 responding to criticism of the FLI letter.

Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

What would count as true or false

True: Marcus's Twitter/X account shows a long tweet or thread, posted on the morning of 2023-03-30 (in his local time zone, US Eastern or Pacific), that addresses criticism of the Future of Life Institute pause letter. Mostly true: such a long post or thread exists from 2023-03-30, but its time of posting or its topic differs slightly (e.g., early afternoon, or it addresses the letter generally rather than the criticism of it). Mostly false: the relevant post was made on a different day, or was short rather than long. False: archives of his account show no post about the FLI letter from that day.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (6)

  1. E1 Experts criticise plan to pause AI research | ForkLog ForkLog · 31 March 2023

    “Another signatory—the psychology professor Gary Marcus—spent most of the day arguing with critics on Twitter, including computer science professor Nick Holliman.”
  2. E2 Musk’s AI letter is a ‘hot mess’ of hype, say critics Business Times (Singapore) · 31 March 2023

    “The open letter, published on Wednesday on the website of the Musk-funded Future of Life Institute, called for a six-month pause in development of powerful AI systems.”
  3. E3 Musk’s AI letter is a ‘hot mess’ of hype, say critics Business Times (Singapore) · 31 March 2023

    “Another signatory, psychology professor Gary Marcus, spent much of the day battling on Twitter with critics including computer science academic Nick Holliman, who accused him of taking part in a “silly distraction”.”
  4. E4 Latest Twitter Threads by @GaryMarcus on Thread Reader App Thread Reader App · 6 January 2025

    “Mar 29, 2023 • 5 tweets • 3 min read”
  5. E5 Experts criticise plan to pause AI research | ForkLog ForkLog · 31 March 2023

    “Another signatory—the psychology professor Gary Marcus—spent most of the day arguing with critics on Twitter, including computer science professor Nick Holliman.”
  6. E6 Experts criticise plan to pause AI research | ForkLog ForkLog · 31 March 2023

    “— Gary Marcus (@GaryMarcus) March 29, 2023”

Reasoning

News reports from 2023-03-31 say Marcus spent much of a day arguing with critics of the FLI letter on Twitter (E1, E3, E5). They do not say which day, and they do not mention a long tweet or thread posted on the morning of 2023-03-30. Thread Reader App lists a 5-tweet thread dated Mar 29, 2023 (E4), and a news article embeds a Marcus tweet dated March 29, 2023 (E6); neither quote shows what the thread was about. Neither shows a long post from the morning of March 30, and none of the evidence shows that no such post exists. The evidence does not settle the timing or content the criteria require.

Cite this claim

Gary Marcus, “Gary Marcus wrote a long Twitter thread on the morning of 2023-03-30 responding to criticism of the FLI letter.” (said 30 March 2023). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_3fc6d005b1fd, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_3fc6d005b1fd

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Gary Marcus, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Gary Marcus

  1. Resolved true Factual 9 November 2024
    “For years I have been warning that “scaling” — eeking out improvements in AI by adding more data and more compute, without making fundamental architectural changes — would not continue forever.”

    Gary Marcus has for years warned that AI scaling by adding data and compute without architectural changes would not continue forever.

  2. Mostly true Factual 31 March 2024
    “In early August, I wrote a piece called What if Generative AI turned out to be a Dud, picked up in the Financial Times and elsewhere.”

    In early August 2023 Gary Marcus wrote a piece titled 'What if Generative AI turned out to be a Dud', which was picked up by the Financial Times and other outlets.

  3. Resolved true Factual February 2024
    “Immediately after the February announcement of Sora, I noted Sora’s troubles with physics and predicted that they wouldn’t go away. They haven’t.”

    After Sora's February 2024 announcement, Marcus predicted its physics troubles would persist, and they have.

  4. Mostly true Factual 26 October 2023
    “So it was heartening to see many of the ideas that I have been pushing for a long time, including a CERN for AI and Global AI governance (which I emphasized in April in my TED talk and in The…”

    Gary Marcus emphasized a CERN for AI and global AI governance in April 2023 in his TED talk and in The Economist.

  5. Resolved true Factual 30 March 2023
    “It actually called for *more* research.”

    The FLI open letter called for more AI research.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.