ClaimsGary Marcus

“Central to the argument was that pure scaling would not solve hallucinations or abstraction; I concluded that “there are serious holes in the scaling argument.””

Gary Marcus, author March 2022 CONFIRMED: LLMs have indeed reached a point of diminishing returns (Marcus on AI) archived copy

Factual Their own work or organisation

Gary Marcus's March 2022 article argued pure scaling would not solve hallucinations or abstraction and concluded there are serious holes in the scaling argument.

Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.

Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

The second judge said resolved true; the verdict shown is the first judge's.

What would count as true or false

Judge against the text of Marcus's March 2022 article (e.g., 'Deep Learning Is Hitting a Wall', Nautilus, March 2022). True: the article argues that scaling alone would not solve hallucinations or unreliability and problems of abstraction or reasoning, and contains the words 'there are serious holes in the scaling argument' or near-identical wording. Mostly true: the article makes both arguments, but the quoted sentence differs slightly in wording, or appears as one point rather than as the conclusion. Mixed: the article makes only one of the two arguments (hallucinations or abstraction), or makes the argument without anything like the quoted conclusion. Mostly false: the article criticises scaling only in general terms, without connecting it to hallucinations or abstraction, and lacks the quoted line. False: no such March 2022 article exists, or it does not argue against scaling.

Set before the research began.

Evidence (4)

  1. E1 Deep Learning Is Hitting a Wall - Nautilus Nautilus · 10 March 2022 Own record

    “There are serious holes in the scaling argument. To begin with, the measures that have scaled have not captured what we desperately need to improve: genuine comprehension.”
  2. E2 Deep Learning Is Hitting a Wall - Nautilus Nautilus · 10 March 2022 Own record

    “In the last several months, research from DeepMind and elsewhere on models even larger than GPT-3 have shown that scaling starts to falter on some measures, such as toxicity, truthfulness, reasoning, and common sense.”
  3. E3 Deep Learning Is Hitting a Wall - Nautilus Nautilus · 10 March 2022 Own record

    “Deep-learning systems are outstanding at interpolating between specific examples they have seen before, but frequently stumble when confronted with novelty.”
  4. E4 Dialogue Origin: “Deep Learning Is Hitting a Wall” “There Is No Wall” Quote Investigator · 4 January 2025

    “In conclusion, the phrase “Deep Learning Is Hitting a Wall” appeared as the title of an article by Gary Marcus in March 2022.”

Reasoning

E4, an independent source, confirms that Marcus published "Deep Learning Is Hitting a Wall" in March 2022. The article itself contains the exact sentence "There are serious holes in the scaling argument" (E1). It argues that scaling falters on truthfulness, reasoning and common sense (E2), and that deep learning stumbles when faced with novelty (E3). So both arguments the claim names appear, in substance, under the criteria's "unreliability" and "reasoning" wording. However, none of the quoted passages from the article uses the word "hallucinations". The quoted sentence opens a section of the argument rather than serving as its conclusion, which fits the "mostly true" criterion.

Cite this claim

Gary Marcus, “Gary Marcus's March 2022 article argued pure scaling would not solve hallucinations or abstraction and concluded there are serious holes in the scaling argument.” (said March 2022). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_3657e0b3d486, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_3657e0b3d486

This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.

Reply to this claim

For Gary Marcus, or someone speaking for them: a correction or counter-evidence. Replies are read before anything is shown; an approved reply shows your name, role, date, statement and link. Your email address is never shown and is deleted 30 days after the decision (privacy).

More factual claims by Gary Marcus

  1. Resolved true Factual 9 November 2024
    “For years I have been warning that “scaling” — eeking out improvements in AI by adding more data and more compute, without making fundamental architectural changes — would not continue forever.”

    Gary Marcus has for years warned that AI scaling by adding data and compute without architectural changes would not continue forever.

  2. Mostly true Factual 31 March 2024
    “In early August, I wrote a piece called What if Generative AI turned out to be a Dud, picked up in the Financial Times and elsewhere.”

    In early August 2023 Gary Marcus wrote a piece titled 'What if Generative AI turned out to be a Dud', which was picked up by the Financial Times and other outlets.

  3. Resolved true Factual February 2024
    “Immediately after the February announcement of Sora, I noted Sora’s troubles with physics and predicted that they wouldn’t go away. They haven’t.”

    After Sora's February 2024 announcement, Marcus predicted its physics troubles would persist, and they have.

  4. Mostly true Factual 26 October 2023
    “So it was heartening to see many of the ideas that I have been pushing for a long time, including a CERN for AI and Global AI governance (which I emphasized in April in my TED talk and in The…”

    Gary Marcus emphasized a CERN for AI and global AI governance in April 2023 in his TED talk and in The Economist.

  5. Resolved true Factual 30 March 2023
    “It actually called for *more* research.”

    The FLI open letter called for more AI research.

All of them

Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.