If some federal action against crypto happens, places such as Wyoming and Miami will probably litigate and fight it, because they have a strong incentive to do so.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
Conditional, hedged prediction with no horizon.
Cite this claim
Balaji Srinivasan, “If some federal action against crypto happens, places such as Wyoming and Miami will probably litigate and fight it, because they have a strong incentive to do so.” (said 25 March 2021). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_2bd43fec2e3c, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_2bd43fec2e3c
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Balaji Srinivasan
-
Resolved true
“France may not be able to hold him prisoner for long.”
France may not be able to hold Telegram founder Pavel Durov in custody for long.
-
Mostly false
“I think that by 2024, you're going to have to use VPN.”
-
Resolved true
“I think China may well be vectoring in that direction.”
China may be moving toward using AI for pervasive, all-seeing control of its population.
-
Mixed
“So the fear is that, if vaccines are eventually rolled out and if enough Americans take them, then by 2023 or 2024, people will be spoiling for a fight to go and beat up China as the one legitimated…”
-
Mostly true
“Censoring anyone (let alone a head of state) in this way will push people towards censorship-resistant platforms.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.