Amodei thinks AI will similarly accelerate the rate of neuroscience advances, so that the framework of '100 years of progress in 5-10 years' applies to neuroscience in the same way it does to biology.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
Tied to the 5-10 years after powerful AI framework, and that horizon has not ended.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “Amodei thinks AI will similarly accelerate the rate of neuroscience advances, so that the framework of '100 years of progress in 5-10 years' applies to neuroscience in the same way it does to biology.” (said 17 August 2015). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_22337cfe4e70, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_22337cfe4e70
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Dario Amodei
-
Mostly false
“We believe AI for biology is on a similar exponential trend.”
-
Resolved true
“for coding, we're going to see very serious things by the end of 2025,”
By the end of 2025, AI will do very serious things in coding.
-
Resolved false
“But I would guess that in another 10 months, we’ll probably get pretty close. We’ll be at least 90%.”
-
Mostly false
“in 10 months we’ve gone from 3% to 50% on this task. And I think in another year we’ll probably be at 90%.”
-
Mostly true
“I would guess a year from now, the models can do this very, very reliably.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.