At a Stanford conference, 80 percent of attendees thought AI would not pass the Turing test soon but believed it would take 100 years.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
Concerns the views of attendees at a Stanford conference that Kurzweil recounted; only the subject's own records could settle it.
Cite this claim
Ray Kurzweil, “At a Stanford conference, 80 percent of attendees thought AI would not pass the Turing test soon but believed it would take 100 years.” (said March 2025). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_1da169abda31, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_1da169abda31
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ray Kurzweil
-
Mixed
“Nobody said it would happen within 30 years, but now everybody is saying that.”
-
Resolved true
“I predicted that we would pass the Turing Test by 2029.”
-
Mostly false
“This observation also applies to rates of paradigm shifts, which are currently doubling approximately every decade.”
The rate of paradigm shifts is currently doubling approximately every decade.
-
Mostly false
“But any serious examination of the history of technology reveals that technological change is at least exponential.”
The history of technology shows technological change is at least exponential.
-
Mostly true
“Rather, it is based on a rich model of diverse technological processes, a model I have been developing over the past couple of decades.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.