In The Age of Spiritual Machines (1999), Kurzweil predicted computers would pass the Turing Test by 2029.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
What would count as true or false
Claim: in 'The Age of Spiritual Machines' (1999), Kurzweil predicted computers would pass the Turing Test by 2029. True if the 1999 book contains a prediction that a computer will pass the Turing Test by 2029. Mostly true if the book predicts this with a minor date discrepancy. Mixed if the prediction exists but the year is materially different. Mostly false if he made such a prediction but not in that book or not with 2029. False if no such prediction appears in his work.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 The Age of Spiritual Machines Wikipedia
“by 2029 machines "routinely" pass the test, although there is still controversy about how machine and human intelligence compare.”
-
E2 the Kurzweil Library Writings by Ray Kurzweil (the Kurzweil Library) · June 2014 Own record
“I specified the 2029 date in my 1999 book The Age of Spiritual Machines.”
-
E3 A Wager on the Turing Test: The Rules KurzweilAI.net (mirror) · 9 April 2002 Own record
“Ray Kurzweil maintains that a computer (i.e., a machine intelligence) will pass the Turing test by 2029.”
Reasoning
E1 is an independent Wikipedia summary of The Age of Spiritual Machines. It says that in the book's scenario for 2029, machines "routinely" pass the Turing Test. Kurzweil's own writings agree: E2 says he gave the 2029 date in the 1999 book, and the 2002 wager rules in E3 say a computer will pass the Turing Test by 2029. The independent summary, backed by the subject's own records, shows that the 1999 book contains a 2029 prediction for passing the Turing Test.
Cite this claim
Ray Kurzweil, “In The Age of Spiritual Machines (1999), Kurzweil predicted computers would pass the Turing Test by 2029.” (said August 2023). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_b8f73bf96419, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_b8f73bf96419
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ray Kurzweil
-
Mixed
“Nobody said it would happen within 30 years, but now everybody is saying that.”
-
Mostly false
“This observation also applies to rates of paradigm shifts, which are currently doubling approximately every decade.”
The rate of paradigm shifts is currently doubling approximately every decade.
-
Mostly false
“But any serious examination of the history of technology reveals that technological change is at least exponential.”
The history of technology shows technological change is at least exponential.
-
Mostly true
“Rather, it is based on a rich model of diverse technological processes, a model I have been developing over the past couple of decades.”
-
Mostly true
“Whatever the approach, we find–at least–double exponential growth.”
Examining technology data in many ways and time scales shows at least double exponential growth.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.