Over GMO's 28 years of asset allocation, most risk reduction for clients came in the 2000 and 2007 US bubbles, which GMO sidestepped to a considerable degree.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
It concerns the sources of risk reduction in GMO's client portfolios, which only GMO's records show.
Cite this claim
Jeremy Grantham, “Over GMO's 28 years of asset allocation, most risk reduction for clients came in the 2000 and 2007 US bubbles, which GMO sidestepped to a considerable degree.” (said 2016). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_09f130f75c32, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_09f130f75c32
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Jeremy Grantham
-
Mostly true
“The tone of the market commentators back in January, when I was writing my last quarterly letter, seemed much too pessimistic on global stock markets, particularly the U.S. market, and I said so.”
-
Mostly true
“I had warned of trouble if China slowed its growth for demand for minerals quickly.”
Grantham had earlier warned of trouble if China quickly slowed its demand growth for minerals.
-
Mixed
“We have been modeling momentum and value as two key variables for 33 years, so this is pretty old hat.”
GMO has modeled momentum and value as two key variables for 33 years.
-
Resolved true
“We are solvent, and we have stayed in business.”
-
Mostly true
“we were 2 to 3 years early in our calls in both cases.”
GMO's calls on the Japan 65 P/E market and the 2000 U.S. tech bubble were 2 to 3 years early.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.