The postwar wealth transfer apparatus never worked as advertised, and Western wealth was largely squandered on white elephant projects.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Reasoning
Evaluative sweeping judgment ('never worked as advertised', 'largely squandered') too vague to test.
Cite this claim
Peter Thiel, “The postwar wealth transfer apparatus never worked as advertised, and Western wealth was largely squandered on white elephant projects.” (said 2007). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_09a4fa9786c7, method 0.1.0+3e03e2df, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_09a4fa9786c7
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Peter Thiel
-
Mostly true
“But if tech means producing more with less, then we should be seeing dramatic economic progress, we don't.”
-
Mostly true
“I tend to measure it in things like these economic terms in the way that the average millennial is having a tougher time than their boomer parents at the same point in life.”
-
Mostly true
“California is not poor.”
-
Mostly true
“The average California government worker gets paid twice as much as the average private sector worker in California.”
-
Mostly true
“We weren't deeply connected to the Soviet Union.”
The US economy was not deeply connected to the Soviet Union's during the Cold War.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.