Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
74 67 80 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
62 43 81 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 1 promise resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 73 (likely 66 to 79, high confidence), from 72 claims: 66 factual claims, 6 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Michael Burry's claims
30 claims
“I think they are already being used more efficiently and that trend will continue, to the detriment of their growth rate.”
Michael Burry, investor, in Substack chat 27 October 2026 Burry says Anthropic's IPO filing changes nothing about AI bear case (Stocktwits)
Burry said he thinks LLMs are already being used more efficiently and that this trend will continue, to the detriment of their growth rate.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Reasoning
Vague prediction about efficiency and growth rate with no horizon or metric.
Cite this claim
Michael Burry, “Burry said he thinks LLMs are already being used more efficiently and that this trend will continue, to the detriment of their growth rate.” (said 27 October 2026). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_ac3423583920, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_ac3423583920
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Michael Burry? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.