Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
67 61 73 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
60 44 76 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 0 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 66 (likely 61 to 72, high confidence), from 105 claims: 94 factual claims, 11 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Marc Andreessen's claims
18 claims
“So, it is possible—I don’t want to be definitive—but it’s possible that that is quite literally timeless.”
Marc Andreessen, a16z co-founder, on podcast 1 May 2025 Marc Andreessen predicts one of the few jobs that may survive the rise of AI automation (Fortune)
Marc Andreessen says the relationship-driven work of venture capital may be literally timeless, i.e. persist indefinitely despite AI.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Reasoning
Claim is about what Andreessen says, a statement of opinion about his own view; the transcript alone shows it.
Cite this claim
Marc Andreessen, “Marc Andreessen says the relationship-driven work of venture capital may be literally timeless, i.e. persist indefinitely despite AI.” (said 1 May 2025). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_fe6d71c19c1c, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_fe6d71c19c1c
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Marc Andreessen? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.