Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
67 61 73 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
60 44 76 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 0 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 66 (likely 61 to 72, high confidence), from 105 claims: 94 factual claims, 11 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Marc Andreessen's claims
1 claim
| Verdict | Kind | Said | Claim | Topic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research failed | Factual | 1 Jan 2018 | Andreessen took part in a debate with Peter Thiel at the Milton Conference. Factual · 1 Jan 2018 | Their own work or organisation |
“So it was a debate at the Milton Conference, which is one of my shining moments.”
Marc Andreessen, a16z co-founder, interviewed 1 January 2018 The Tim Ferriss Show Transcripts: Marc Andreessen (#163) (Tim Ferriss blog)
Andreessen took part in a debate with Peter Thiel at the Milton Conference.
Research failed Research could not run for this claim; not scored.
Reasoning
No resolution criteria were returned for this claim, so it could not be researched.
Cite this claim
Marc Andreessen, “Andreessen took part in a debate with Peter Thiel at the Milton Conference.” (said 1 January 2018). Verdict: research failed. Reliability API, claim c_92a70b1d5449, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_92a70b1d5449
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Marc Andreessen? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.