Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
67 61 73 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
60 44 76 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 0 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 66 (likely 61 to 72, high confidence), from 105 claims: 94 factual claims, 11 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Marc Andreessen's claims
1,009 claims · page 11 of 11
“We wanted to make Mosaic friendly for people to use.”
Marc Andreessen June 1995 Smithsonian Oral and Video Histories: Marc Andreessen (Smithsonian)
We wanted to make Mosaic friendly for people to use.
Not checkable An opinion, value judgement or statement with nothing to check.
Cite this claim
Marc Andreessen, “We wanted to make Mosaic friendly for people to use.” (said June 1995). Verdict: not checkable. Reliability API, claim c_ea6a7a250b4d, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_ea6a7a250b4d
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Marc Andreessen? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.