Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
75 61 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Insufficient record: 2 predictions resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 75 (likely 61 to 88, low confidence), from 12 claims: 12 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Jim Cramer's claims
30 claims
“the OS will be as important as Apple so privacy issue is obviated”
Jim Cramer, writing on X 23 June 2022 Post by @jimcramer on X, 2022-06-23 (X)
The Metaverse operating system will become as important as Apple, making privacy concerns moot.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Reasoning
Vague, undated prediction with undefined terms ('as important as Apple', privacy 'moot').
Cite this claim
Jim Cramer, “The Metaverse operating system will become as important as Apple, making privacy concerns moot.” (said 23 June 2022). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_e363101f1877, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_e363101f1877
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Jim Cramer? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.