Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
75 61 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Insufficient record: 2 predictions resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 75 (likely 61 to 88, low confidence), from 12 claims: 12 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Jim Cramer's claims
30 claims
“Michelle i own no Eli Lilly stock.”
Jim Cramer, on X 20 December 2019 Post by @jimcramer on X, 2019-12-20 (X)
Jim Cramer owns no Eli Lilly stock.
Own records only Only the person's or their organisation's own records speak to it, so it is not scored.
Reasoning
Personal holdings are disclosed only by Cramer, though some disclosures may exist; mainly his own records.
Cite this claim
Jim Cramer, “Jim Cramer owns no Eli Lilly stock.” (said 20 December 2019). Verdict: own records only. Reliability API, claim c_7dccac62ad79, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_7dccac62ad79
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Jim Cramer? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.