Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
75 61 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Insufficient record: 2 predictions resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 75 (likely 61 to 88, low confidence), from 12 claims: 12 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Jim Cramer's claims
30 claims
“I do know that there have been many doctors who have tried it and not been able to replicate the good results we have read about.”
Jim Cramer, on X 31 March 2020 Post by @jimcramer on X, 2020-03-31 (X)
Many doctors who have tried the treatment, which the quote does not name, have not been able to replicate the good results that had been reported.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Reasoning
Refers to an unspecified thread and treatment; the claim is too undefined to test.
Cite this claim
Jim Cramer, “Many doctors who have tried the treatment, which the quote does not name, have not been able to replicate the good results that had been reported.” (said 31 March 2020). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_59c138b7c0cf, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_59c138b7c0cf
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Jim Cramer? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.