Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
75 61 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Insufficient record: 2 predictions resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 75 (likely 61 to 88, low confidence), from 12 claims: 12 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Jim Cramer's claims
30 claims
“Oil leading futures lower eventually”
Jim Cramer, posting on X 27 March 2026 Post by @jimcramer on X, 2026-03-27 (X)
Oil prices will eventually lead stock index futures lower.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Reasoning
'Eventually' gives no horizon, so it can't be tested.
Cite this claim
Jim Cramer, “Oil prices will eventually lead stock index futures lower.” (said 27 March 2026). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_59366470c9e2, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_59366470c9e2
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Jim Cramer? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.