Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
84 79 88 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Insufficient record: 2 predictions resolved, 5 needed for a score.
-
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 3 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
-
Guidance
A company's own figures for its results over a period, checked against what it then reported.
Insufficient record: 1 guidance claim resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 84 (likely 79 to 88, high confidence), from 90 claims: 90 factual claims. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Jeff Bezos's claims
529 claims · page 6 of 6
“We first measure ourselves in terms of the metrics most indicative of our market leadership”
Jeff Bezos 21 March 1998 Jeff Bezos' Original 1997 Letter to Amazon Shareholders (About Amazon)
We first measure ourselves in terms of the metrics most indicative of our market leadership
Not checkable An opinion, value judgement or statement with nothing to check.
Cite this claim
Jeff Bezos, “We first measure ourselves in terms of the metrics most indicative of our market leadership” (said 21 March 1998). Verdict: not checkable. Reliability API, claim c_476979787055, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_476979787055
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Jeff Bezos? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.