Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
79 72 85 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
80 72 88 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 1 promise resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 79 (likely 74 to 84, high confidence), from 102 claims: 64 factual claims, 38 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Gary Marcus's claims
13 claims
“In the midterms, AI will be an election issue for first time.”
Gary Marcus, author January 2026 Six (or seven) predictions for AI 2026 from a Generative AI realist (Marcus on AI)
In the 2026 US midterm elections, AI will be an election issue for the first time.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2026 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Gary Marcus, “In the 2026 US midterm elections, AI will be an election issue for the first time.” (said January 2026). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_d76f12fc70f4, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_d76f12fc70f4
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Gary Marcus? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.