ClaimsPeople

Gary Marcus

Gary Marcus is an author and AI entrepreneur and professor emeritus at NYU; he has written six books, including Rebooting AI and Taming Silicon Valley, founded Geometric Intelligence (bought by Uber), testified at the May 2023 US Senate AI hearing, and writes a newsletter with over 121,000 subscribers.

712 claims collected, 213 researched, 103 resolved. Report of 4 November 2026, method 0.1.0+c876030c.

Scores by kind of claim

Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.

  • Factual claims

    Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?

    79 72 85

    High confidence, 64 factual claims resolved. From 18 documents, 2019 to 2026; 19 documents sampled from 37 candidates found.

    Not scored: 32 unresolvable, 4 checkable only against their own records.

  • Predictions

    Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?

    80 72 88

    Medium confidence, 38 predictions resolved. From 7 documents, 2019 to 2025; 19 documents sampled from 37 candidates found.

    Not scored: 60 unresolvable. 13 more fall due later.

    Does not yet allow for how likely each prediction was when made.

  • Promises

    Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?

    Insufficient record: 1 promise resolved, 5 needed for a score.

    Not scored: 1 unresolvable.

All types combined: 79 (likely 74 to 84, high confidence), from 102 claims: 64 factual claims, 38 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.

Gary Marcus's claims

383 claims · page 1 of 4

383 claims, sorted by newest said. Choose a claim to read it in full.
VerdictKindSaidClaimTopic
Not checkable Not checkable 25 Sep 2026 Huang is making a fool of himself, by telling the world we can trust the companies, when each passing hour makes it clearer that we can’t. Not checkable · 25 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 25 Sep 2026 It’s time (past time, really) to (temporarily) shut down OpenAI. Not checkable · 25 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 25 Sep 2026 About the closest thing to an honest account of what happened – and I seriously doubt even this is completely candid – came out about an… Not checkable · 25 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 25 Sep 2026 In the process, Jensen comes across as deeply out of touch with his own industry. Not checkable · 25 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 25 Sep 2026 What they should do is to replace management with someone a whole lot more competent, and a whole lot more candid. Not checkable · 25 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 25 Sep 2026 A change in management would be a good idea, too. Not checkable · 25 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 25 Sep 2026 No amount of Jensen proclaiming that 2 + 2= 5 is going to change that. Not checkable · 25 Sep 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 2 Jun 2026 The financial world is taking a lot more notice of my skepticism than it used to. Not checkable · 2 Jun 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 2 Jun 2026 My critique of tokenmaxxing is getting picked up, too Not checkable · 2 Jun 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 2 Jun 2026 Bain’s conclusions yesterday almost perfectly the old definition of insanity that I keep quoting Not checkable · 2 Jun 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 2 Jun 2026 None of that would matter in the near term if people weren’t noticing. Not checkable · 2 Jun 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 2 Jun 2026 I seriously hope that I am wrong about this. Not checkable · 2 Jun 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 2 Jun 2026 Garran’s distillation of why the LLM industry will never be commercially viable was crystal clear and compelling. Not checkable · 2 Jun 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 2 Jun 2026 the economics don’t make sense, and more and more people are starting to notice. Not checkable · 2 Jun 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 2 Jun 2026 Timing when all this might fall apart is hard Not checkable · 2 Jun 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 2 Jun 2026 everybody seems to think that trend is over. Not checkable · 2 Jun 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 2 Jun 2026 But I doubt it. Not checkable · 2 Jun 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 2 Jun 2026 Everyone involved in both podcasts share my concerns Not checkable · 2 Jun 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 2 Jun 2026 But they are. Not checkable · 2 Jun 2026
Not checkable Not checkable Jan 2026 across the field, the intellectual situation has gone from one that was stagnant (all LLMs all the time) and unrealistic (“AGI is nigh”) to… Not checkable · Jan 2026
Not checkable Not checkable Jan 2026 If anything would lead to genuine progress, it would be that. Not checkable · Jan 2026
Not checkable Not checkable Jan 2026 LLMs still aren’t reliable; the economics look dubious. Not checkable · Jan 2026
Not checkable Not checkable Jan 2026 Astonishing how much the vibe has shifted in just a few months, especially with people like Sutskever and Sutton coming out with their own… Not checkable · Jan 2026
Not checkable Not checkable Jan 2026 At this point I doubt many people would publicly disagree, but just a few months ago the world was rather different. Not checkable · Jan 2026
Not checkable Not checkable 27 Jul 2025 I guarantee that minds will be blown. Not checkable · 27 Jul 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 27 Jul 2025 I was right on the money then. Not checkable · 27 Jul 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 27 Jul 2025 Shiny things are always fun to play with, and I fully expect GPT-5 to be the shiniest so far, but that doesn’t mean that it is a critical… Not checkable · 27 Jul 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 27 Jul 2025 GPT-5 will still, like its predecessors, be a bull in a china shop, reckless and hard to control. Not checkable · 27 Jul 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 But in general, like we don’t have the same amount of sort of person hours on these alternatives. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 For example, in biology, you still have to do empirical work. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 If you specify your constraints in prolog, but you specify the wrong constraints, you’re still in trouble. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 Yeah, and, I mean, it raises the question about the possibility of moral progress. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 Like, I don’t think there’s enough societal support for looking at alternatives. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 That’s a choice. And I think it’s a wrong choice. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 But I’ll also say I’ve seen a lot of demos that you know took longer to be realized. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 And someday, we will both be proven right. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 you wouldn’t build a GPS navigation system that way. You shouldn’t build a domestic robot that way. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 Intelligence is multi dimensional. They’re smarter in some dimensions. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 It has to start with neuro symbolic AI, which I think we agree about right? Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I think that we could hard code things and make them fixed. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I absolutely agree. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I think that people try to duck the second harder problem, and they say “well, we can never do it because humans don’t agree on values.” Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I worry a lot about the security and maintainability of the code that’s being written. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 These are two separate issues. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I think if you don’t have that as some part of your system, you’re in real trouble. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 That’s the one we’re in now. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 Lots of basic stuff that the LLM world has just not confronted. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 fundamentally, they’re mimics, and they’re better than just the simple memorizing system. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 The system’s level of comprehension of the words that are put in those prompts is poor in some sense, and they’re not compliant with the… Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 But there’s also the case that complex software just usually doesn’t work. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 We’re not that good as a society engineering complex software. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 Investors are herd animals. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 But I think that there’s a lot of sort of “human compatible,” to borrow Stuart Russell’s term, a lot of “human compatible” values that we… Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I’m not sure how much other animals can do that. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I think it should be a baseline value. You don’t kill people, at least not without a good reason. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 That is a failure to adopt an explicit set of rules, to be constrained by them. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 These things have to be first class citizens in, I think, any AGI system. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 That’s part of why I hedge my bets. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 Right now. People have their own ideas about LLMs. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 We really want systems that we can count on in the way that we can count on calculators. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 That is a potential situation. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 Maybe it’s 2029. Maybe it’s 2039. Maybe it’s 2049. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I would say a minimal requirement for control, not a sufficient one, but a necessary one, is that we should be able to state, let’s say… Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I don’t think that’s the situation we’re in now. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I think we could do more to prepare than we have. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 We probably have similar dumb ideas, but one, the most obvious one, is we think it’s okay to eat meat, and probably we should stop thinking… Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 But someday, I think people will see. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I think for me, you need a world model of entities and their properties, stable over time, and that is tied closely together with knowledge… Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 Which is, I think if you don’t have explicit knowledge as part of your system, as first class citizens, you’re limited in control. And I… Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 And we want to get to one where they’re smart enough to follow the constraints, but not, you know, resisting what we tell them. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 You’ve got some money to do it. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 So to my mind, there are like hundreds of puzzles we haven’t solved. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 We don’t need AGI to eliminate some human work. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I don’t really see that. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 There’s work to be done, but there’s, you know, reasonable consensus in society to get started on it. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I think quantifier bindings, maybe. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 So I can’t personally vouch for the work, because I haven’t gone through it. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I’m not that fond, by the way, of the “people break too” thing. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I do think we could do better. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 You know, AGI is not going to be magic, right? Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 Yeah, that’s an optimism that needs to be based in a plan, which we don’t have. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 I have a phrase I like, which is that AI, current AI, is morally and technically inadequate. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 2025 You shouldn’t be surprised. Not checkable · 2025
Not checkable Not checkable 9 Nov 2024 As I have always warned, that’s just a fantasy. Not checkable · 9 Nov 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 9 Nov 2024 There is no principled solution to hallucinations in systems that traffic only in the statistics of language without explicit… Not checkable · 9 Nov 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 9 Nov 2024 I’m glad that the market is finally recognizing that what I’ve been saying is true. Not checkable · 9 Nov 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 9 Nov 2024 The thing is, in the long term, science isn’t majority rule. In the end, the truth generally outs. Not checkable · 9 Nov 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 31 Mar 2024 I am not yet ready to claim victory. Not checkable · 31 Mar 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 31 Mar 2024 The more hype, the bigger the fall, if expectations aren’t met. Not checkable · 31 Mar 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 31 Mar 2024 Other problems are modest in size. Not checkable · 31 Mar 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 31 Mar 2024 The entire industry is based on hype, and on the specific hope that the kinds of problems we saw again and again with GPT-2, GPT-3, and… Not checkable · 31 Mar 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 31 Mar 2024 You have software that isn’t making much money, isn’t secure, and is keeping a lot of people up at night. Not checkable · 31 Mar 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 31 Mar 2024 To be honest, I am not confident Generative AI as currently envisioned will ever come together. Not checkable · 31 Mar 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 31 Mar 2024 But as time goes on, I increasingly believe that call was correct. Not checkable · 31 Mar 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 31 Mar 2024 Find some huge problem(s) that they can charge a lot for. Not checkable · 31 Mar 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 31 Mar 2024 the dud idea itself has become quite mainstream. Not checkable · 31 Mar 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 31 Mar 2024 Meanwhile hype itself is becoming a kind of risk factor. Not checkable · 31 Mar 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 31 Mar 2024 Thus far, the closest thing to a killer app is probably coding assistace Not checkable · 31 Mar 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 31 Mar 2024 Some new facts have come to light Not checkable · 31 Mar 2024
Not checkable Not checkable 26 Oct 2023 the collective sum of those efforts hasn’t yielded all that much. Not checkable · 26 Oct 2023
Back to the list

Gary Marcus

Open its page

Not checkable

“I think for me, you need a world model of entities and their properties, stable over time, and that is tied closely together with knowledge representation – and everything else is a shortcut.”

Gary Marcus 2025 Dr. Ben Goertzel's Conversation with Dr. Gary Marcus at the World AI Summit 2025 (SingularityNET)

I think for me, you need a world model of entities and their properties, stable over time, and that is tied closely together with knowledge…

Not checkable An opinion, value judgement or statement with nothing to check.

Cite this claim

Gary Marcus, “I think for me, you need a world model of entities and their properties, stable over time, and that is tied closely together with knowledge…” (said 2025). Verdict: not checkable. Reliability API, claim c_bd37d3198bf2, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_bd37d3198bf2

Claims without a verdict

Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Gary Marcus? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.