Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
79 72 85 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
80 72 88 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 1 promise resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 79 (likely 74 to 84, high confidence), from 102 claims: 64 factual claims, 38 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Gary Marcus's claims
13 claims
“And it would be miraculous or horrible, depending on the outcome, but improbable, shall we say, if we were to solve all of those in five years.”
Gary Marcus, in conversation 2025 Dr. Ben Goertzel's Conversation with Dr. Gary Marcus at the World AI Summit 2025 (SingularityNET)
It would be improbable for all of those outstanding AI problems to be solved within five years.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2030 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Gary Marcus, “It would be improbable for all of those outstanding AI problems to be solved within five years.” (said 2025). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_b0c6a783b413, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_b0c6a783b413
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Gary Marcus? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.