Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
79 72 85 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
80 72 88 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 1 promise resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 79 (likely 74 to 84, high confidence), from 102 claims: 64 factual claims, 38 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Gary Marcus's claims
13 claims
“In retrospectives written in 2043, intellectual historians will conclude that there was an initial overemphasis on large language models, and a gradual but critical shift of the pendulum back to more structured systems with deeper comprehension.”
Gary Marcus, author 27 July 2025 What to Expect When You're Expecting … GPT-5 (Marcus on AI)
Retrospectives written in 2043 will conclude there was an initial overemphasis on LLMs and a shift back to more structured systems.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2043 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Gary Marcus, “Retrospectives written in 2043 will conclude there was an initial overemphasis on LLMs and a shift back to more structured systems.” (said 27 July 2025). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_aa6ccf29b9d8, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_aa6ccf29b9d8
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Gary Marcus? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.