Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
79 72 85 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
80 72 88 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 1 promise resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 79 (likely 74 to 84, high confidence), from 102 claims: 64 factual claims, 38 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Gary Marcus's claims
13 claims
“No country will take a decisive lead in the GenAI “race”.”
Gary Marcus, author January 2026 Six (or seven) predictions for AI 2026 from a Generative AI realist (Marcus on AI)
No country will take a decisive lead in the generative AI race in 2026.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2026 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Gary Marcus, “No country will take a decisive lead in the generative AI race in 2026.” (said January 2026). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_76bd73ecc5c1, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_76bd73ecc5c1
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Gary Marcus? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.