Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
79 72 85 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
80 72 88 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 1 promise resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 79 (likely 74 to 84, high confidence), from 102 claims: 64 factual claims, 38 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Gary Marcus's claims
13 claims
“It certainly will happen in the next 500 years—there’s no mathematical reason why it can’t be done.”
Gary Marcus, interviewee 20 September 2019 Gary Marcus on Why AI Needs a Reboot (Psychology Today)
Machines will achieve world-class scientific reasoning within the next 500 years (by 2519).
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2519 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Gary Marcus, “Machines will achieve world-class scientific reasoning within the next 500 years (by 2519).” (said 20 September 2019). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_4cd90c5b7f9e, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_4cd90c5b7f9e
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Gary Marcus? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.