Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
81 76 87 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Insufficient record: 2 predictions resolved, 5 needed for a score.
-
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
65 45 83
All types combined: 80 (likely 75 to 85, high confidence), from 84 claims: 78 factual claims, 6 promises. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Demis Hassabis's claims
16 claims
“And then that should hopefully lead to maximum human flourishing, and we help cure all these terrible diseases”
Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind, interviewee 10 April 2026 HUGE Conversations w/ Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis (Transcript) (The Singju Post)
Within 50 years, AI-enabled abundance could lead to human flourishing, cured diseases, longer healthier lives and travel to the stars.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Reasoning
deadline 2076 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Demis Hassabis, “Within 50 years, AI-enabled abundance could lead to human flourishing, cured diseases, longer healthier lives and travel to the stars.” (said 10 April 2026). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_29a5e410b1fe, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_29a5e410b1fe
Claims without a verdict
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Demis Hassabis? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.