Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
76 69 82 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
56 42 70 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 4 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 72 (likely 66 to 78, high confidence), from 93 claims: 76 factual claims, 17 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Dario Amodei's claims
“I would not be surprised at all if we hit ASL-3 next year.”
Dario Amodei, Anthropic CEO 11 November 2024 Transcript for Dario Amodei: Anthropic CEO on Claude, AGI & the Future of AI & Humanity (Lex Fridman Podcast)
Dario Amodei said he would not be surprised at all if Anthropic's models hit ASL-3 in 2025.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
The evidence is the person's or their organisation's own records.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
The test is whether, between 1 Jan and 31 Dec 2025, Anthropic formally determined that one of its models required ASL-3 protections under its Responsible Scaling Policy. This includes a precautionary determination that ASL-3 capability could not be ruled out, followed by activation of the ASL-3 deployment and/or security standard. TRUE: such a determination or activation is dated within 2025. MOSTLY TRUE: the activation happened in 2025, but Anthropic described it as covering only one of its ASL-3 capability thresholds (for example CBRN only) rather than all of them. MIXED: not normally used, because this is a single-outcome prediction. MOSTLY FALSE: the first ASL-3 determination came only after 31 Dec 2025, or it came before 2025 (so the model did not 'hit' it next year). Also mostly false if the only 2025 events were internal statements that a model was 'close to' ASL-3, with no activation. FALSE: Anthropic records from 2025 or later (RSP capability reports, system cards) show that every model deployed in 2025 stayed under ASL-2 with no ASL-3 determination.
Evidence
- Activating AI Safety Level 3 protections Anthropic · 22 May 2025 Own record
“And indeed, in the lead up to releasing Claude Opus 4, we proactively decided to launch it under the ASL-3 Standard.”
- ActivatingASL-3_2025 Anthropic · May 2025 Own record
“the ASL-3 Standard, and we are implementing it now as a precautionary measure.”
- Claude 4.1 System Card Anthropic · August 2025 Own record
“Like Claude Opus 4, Claude Opus 4.1 is deployed under the AI Safety Level 3 (ASL-3)”
- Anthropic’s Transparency Hub Anthropic Own record
“Based on our evaluations detailed below, we ruled out the need to release Claude Haiku 4.5 under the ASL-3 Standard and are instead releasing it under the ASL-2 Standard.”
Reasoning
Anthropic's official announcement dated 2025-05-22 [E1] says it proactively chose to launch Claude Opus 4 under the ASL-3 Standard. The accompanying May 2025 report [E2] says ASL-3 is being implemented now as a precautionary measure. Both match the criteria's precautionary-determination-plus-activation case within 2025, and the August 2025 Claude 4.1 System Card [E3] confirms ASL-3 deployment continued. These are Anthropic's own official records, and the quoted text does not say the activation was limited to a single capability threshold, so the evidence supports true rather than mostly true.
Cite this claim
Dario Amodei, “Dario Amodei said he would not be surprised at all if Anthropic's models hit ASL-3 in 2025.” (said 11 November 2024). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_4e404ff97d27, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_4e404ff97d27
Claims without a verdict
- Unresolvable 157
- Not yet due 40
- Own records only 43
- Not researched 134
- Not checkable 864
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Dario Amodei? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.