Scores by kind of claim
Each kind of claim is scored on its own, out of 100: the share that held up, with the range it likely falls in. Fewer resolved claims give a wider range.
-
Factual claims
Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
76 70 81 -
Predictions
Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
68 54 82 -
Promises
Commitments to the person's or organisation's own future action, with something to deliver: was it delivered?
Insufficient record: 3 promises resolved, 5 needed for a score.
All types combined: 74 (likely 69 to 80, high confidence), from 96 claims: 82 factual claims, 14 predictions. It mixes kinds of claim in different proportions for different people, so compare people kind by kind.
Bill Ackman's claims
9 claims
“With only 25% of its entitlements utilized, Ward Village offers substantial continued value creation for HHC over the next decade.”
Bill Ackman, writing in PSH investor letter 17 May 2018 Pershing Square 1Q18 Investor Letter (Pershing Square Holdings)
With 25% of entitlements utilized, Ward Village will offer substantial continued value creation for Howard Hughes over the next decade.
Not yet due The date it refers to has not come.
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
deadline 2028 is after 2026-11-04
Cite this claim
Bill Ackman, “With 25% of entitlements utilized, Ward Village will offer substantial continued value creation for Howard Hughes over the next decade.” (said 17 May 2018). Verdict: not yet due. Reliability API, claim c_db8d05910980, method 0.1.0+c876030c. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_db8d05910980
Claims without a verdict
- Unresolvable 135
- Not yet due 9
- Own records only 29
- Not researched 162
- Not checkable 431
Is a verdict here wrong, or do you speak for Bill Ackman? Reply on the claim's own page, with the form at its foot (how replies work). Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts and scores are made.