Yudkowsky said he did not sign the open letter because he thinks it understates the seriousness of the situation and asks for too little to solve it.
Resolved true The record shows it happened or was so.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
What would count as true or false
The claim is that Yudkowsky said this, not that his view is correct. True: a verifiable text or recording by Yudkowsky (e.g. his TIME op-ed of late March 2023 or a reproduction of it) says he did not sign the open letter calling for a pause on AI development because it understates the seriousness of the situation and asks for too little to solve it, in those words or the same sense. Mostly true: he gave this as his reason, but the wording differs in a detail that does not change the meaning, or the source differs slightly from the one implied (e.g. a different venue or date). Mixed: he gave only one of the two reasons (understating seriousness / asking too little), or gave these reasons alongside others that change the meaning. Mostly false: he commented on the letter and criticised it, but did not give these as his reasons for not signing. False: the record shows he signed the letter, or no such statement appears in the cited op-ed or his other statements and the attributed text is shown to be someone else's or fabricated.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 Halt AI Learning Indefinitely, or 'Everyone Will Die' Newser · 30 March 2023
“Yet he refrained from joining Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, and others in signing an open letter calling for a six-month halt on AI systems learning.”
-
E2 Machine Learning Expert Calls for Bombing Data Centers to Stop Rise of AI Futurism · 31 March 2023
““I refrained from signing because I think the letter is understating the seriousness of the situation,” the ML researcher wrote, “and asking for too little to solve it.””
-
E3 TIME. ELIEZER YUDKOWSKY. Pausing AI Developments Isn't Enough. We Need to Shut it All Down. 29 MARCH 2023 blog.biocomm.ai · 29 March 2023
“This 6-month moratorium would be better than no moratorium. I have respect for everyone who stepped up and signed it. It’s an improvement on the margin.”
Reasoning
Futurism's report on Yudkowsky's TIME op-ed quotes him word for word: "I refrained from signing because I think the letter is understating the seriousness of the situation and asking for too little to solve it" (E5). Newser separately confirms that he did not join Musk, Wozniak and others in signing the six-month pause letter (E2). A reproduction of the op-ed (E6) shows the same context, in which he discusses the moratorium and the people who signed it. Futurism quotes the statement as Yudkowsky's own written words [E5], and Newser independently confirms that he did not sign the letter [E2], so the claim resolves as true.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “Yudkowsky said he did not sign the open letter because he thinks it understates the seriousness of the situation and asks for too little to solve it.” (said 7 April 2023). Verdict: resolved true. Reliability API, claim c_fe7512ee2cb1, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_fe7512ee2cb1
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Mostly true
“I mean, as far as I know, I'm the person who originally made that argument.”
Yudkowsky said that, as far as he knows, he was the person who originally made that argument.
-
Mixed
“MIRI has something called the Visible Thoughts Project, which did not get enough funding and enough personnel and was going too slowly.”
-
Mostly true
“I have refused to deploy timelines with fancy probabilities on them consistently for many years”
-
Mostly true
“I previously thought that when intelligence was built, there were going to be multiple specialized systems in there.”
Yudkowsky previously thought that building intelligence would involve multiple specialized systems.
-
Resolved true
“My TIME piece did not suggest nuclear strikes against countries that refuse to sign on to a global agreement against large AI training runs.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.