The amount of image training data available for self-supervised learning is essentially unlimited, with billions of new images per day.
Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge said resolved true; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
Judge as of 2021. True: credible sources from around 2021 show that the amount of image data available for self-supervised learning (images that need no labels) was so large that it was not a practical limit, with billions of new images shared online per day (e.g. platform upload statistics on the order of billions per day). Mostly true: the volume of images was vast and effectively not limiting, but the 'billions per day' figure is somewhat overstated (e.g. hundreds of millions to about one billion per day). Mixed: images were plentiful, but credible evidence from that period shows that usable data (after licensing, privacy, curation or quality filtering) was a real constraint, so 'essentially unlimited' is only partly right. Mostly false: daily image volumes were much lower than claimed, or usable data was clearly a binding limit, and the claim turns a large figure into 'unlimited'. False: evidence shows image data for self-supervised learning was scarce or tightly limited in 2021.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 Now Patched Vulnerability in WhatsApp could have led to data exposure of users - Check Point Research Check Point Research · 2 September 2021
“Approximately 55 billion messages are sent daily over WhatsApp, with 4.5 billion photos and 1 billion videos shared per day.”
-
E2 90% of young women report using a filter or editing their photos before posting ScienceDaily (City University London press release) · 8 March 2021
“"With nearly 100 million photos posted every single day on Instagram alone, we have never been such a visually dominated society.”
-
E3 Self-supervised Pretraining of Visual Features in the Wild arXiv (Goyal, Caron, Lefaudeux, et al.; Facebook AI Research) Own record
“Further, these methods are amenable to online learning, making them perfect candidates for training large models on unlimited data.”
-
E4 Self-supervised Pretraining of Visual Features in the Wild arXiv (Goyal, Caron, Lefaudeux, et al.; Facebook AI Research) Own record
“For our billion scale pretraining, we consider a dataloader that directly samples random, public, and non-EU images from Instagram.”
Reasoning
E1, an independent 2021 source, reports about 4.5 billion photos shared per day on WhatsApp alone, which supports the 'billions per day' scale. E2 reports nearly 100 million photos posted daily on Instagram. However, E4 shows that Facebook AI Research's billion-scale self-supervised pretraining sampled random, public, non-EU Instagram images. So at least one billion-scale pretraining effort sampled only a subset of uploaded images [E4]. Still, nothing in the evidence shows that usable data was a binding limit: E4 describes billion-scale pretraining and E3 calls these methods suited to training large models on unlimited data, which supports 'essentially unlimited' in practice but with qualifications.
Cite this claim
Yann LeCun, “The amount of image training data available for self-supervised learning is essentially unlimited, with billions of new images per day.” (said 2021). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_fe6fadd2eaa0, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_fe6fadd2eaa0
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Yann LeCun
-
Mostly false
“Every day, users upload 2 to 3 billion photos on Facebook.”
-
Mostly true
“Now, imagine a box with 500 million knobs, 1,000 light bulbs, and 10 million images to train it with.”
-
Mostly true
“An actual face detection application was demonstrated on this system, achieving 10fps on VGA images [52].”
A face detection application on the CNP system was demonstrated achieving 10 fps on VGA images.
-
Resolved false
““Those agents are doing exactly what they’ve been asked to do,” LeCun said.”
-
Resolved true
““It’s AI for the physical world, so it’s not language-related,” LeCun said.”
AMI Labs' work is AI for the physical world and is not language-related.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.