A face detection application on the CNP system was demonstrated achieving 10 fps on VGA images.
Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge said resolved true; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
True if the cited work ([52], for example Farabet et al. on the CNP FPGA system) reports a face detection application demonstrated on the CNP that runs at about 10 frames per second on VGA (640x480) images. Mostly true if it was demonstrated on the CNP with a small difference in frame rate (roughly 8–12 fps) or a slightly different resolution. Mixed or mostly false if the frame rate or resolution differs substantially, for example 10 fps only at lower resolution, or if the demonstration was a simulation rather than on the system. False if no face detection demonstration on the CNP was reported.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 An FPGA-Based Stream Processor for Embedded Real-Time Vision with Convolutional Networks Farabet, Poulet, LeCun (Courant Institute, NYU); hosted on yann.lecun.com Own record
“Real-time face detection is demonstrated, with speeds of 10 frames per second at VGA resolution.”
-
E2 An FPGA-Based Stream Processor for Embedded Real-Time Vision with Convolutional Networks Farabet, Poulet, LeCun (Courant Institute, NYU); hosted on yann.lecun.com Own record
“Computing the same ConvNet on a monoscale input reduces this time by a factor of 1.5, or allows full VGA frames (640 × 480) to be processed at 10fps.”
-
E3 CNP: an fpga-based processor for convolutional networks Farabet, Poulet, Han, LeCun (Courant Institute, NYU; Perceptive Pixel Inc.); hosted on yann.lecun.com · 2009 Own record
“Face detection on a 512 × 384 frame takes 100ms (10 frames per second), which corresponds to an average performance of 3.4×109 connections per second for this 340 million connection network.”
-
E4 FeatherNet: An Accelerated Convolutional Neural Network Design for Resource-constrained FPGAs ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems (authors at American University of Beirut and Intel) · March 2019
“The CNP could process 10 frames per second using a ConvNet with 2 million synaptic connections.”
Reasoning
The abstract of the CNP paper by Farabet, Poulet and LeCun says that real-time face detection was demonstrated at 10 frames per second at VGA resolution (E1). The same paper adds that running the ConvNet on a single-scale (monoscale) input allows full VGA frames (640×480) to be processed at 10 fps (E2). The companion FPL 2009 CNP paper reports face detection at 10 fps on 512×384 frames (E3), a somewhat lower resolution than VGA. A later independent review confirms that the CNP processed 10 frames per second but names no resolution or application (E4), so the claim holds overall with a small qualification about resolution.
Cite this claim
Yann LeCun, “A face detection application on the CNP system was demonstrated achieving 10 fps on VGA images.” (said 2010). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_a07443dde01e, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_a07443dde01e
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Yann LeCun
-
Mostly true
“So the amount of training data there is essentially unlimited.”
-
Mostly false
“Every day, users upload 2 to 3 billion photos on Facebook.”
-
Mostly true
“Now, imagine a box with 500 million knobs, 1,000 light bulbs, and 10 million images to train it with.”
-
Resolved false
““Those agents are doing exactly what they’ve been asked to do,” LeCun said.”
-
Resolved true
““It’s AI for the physical world, so it’s not language-related,” LeCun said.”
AMI Labs' work is AI for the physical world and is not language-related.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.