If the AI winter the subject said he had hoped for happened, the timeline he was discussing could be about 16 years.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
Conditional speculation with undefined 'dangerous AI'.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “If the AI winter the subject said he had hoped for happened, the timeline he was discussing could be about 16 years.” (said February 2023). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_f93bcd2df267, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_f93bcd2df267
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Mostly false
“So probably Paul’s going to win, but slight moral victory.”
-
Mixed
“Beating GPT-4 on GI just forces OpenAI to release 4.5.”
-
Resolved false
“The current crop of people will not try it.”
-
Resolved true
“Alignment will not be solved in a few years.”
-
Resolved true
“even if GPT-5 doesn’t end the world, which I agree is like more than 50% of where my probability mass lies”
GPT-5 will not end the world, with more than 50% of Yudkowsky's probability on that outcome.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.