Even if an AGI ends up perfectly inner-aligned on a sensory reward signal, an AGI strongly optimizing on that signal "will kill you", because the sensory reward signal was not a ground truth about alignment as seen by the operators.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Said for an organisation they lead or work for; it counts on both records.
Reasoning
Prediction about a hypothetical AGI with no horizon; untestable.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “Even if an AGI ends up perfectly inner-aligned on a sensory reward signal, an AGI strongly optimizing on that signal "will kill you", because the sensory reward signal was not a ground truth about alignment as seen by the operators.” (said 10 June 2022). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_f7905d2dc581, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_f7905d2dc581
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Resolved false
“The current crop of people will not try it.”
-
Resolved true
“Alignment will not be solved in a few years.”
-
Resolved true
“even if GPT-5 doesn’t end the world, which I agree is like more than 50% of where my probability mass lies”
GPT-5 will not end the world, with more than 50% of Yudkowsky's probability on that outcome.
-
Mostly true
“Most AI researchers will not want to make unFriendly AIs.”
-
Mixed
“Beating GPT-4 on GI just forces OpenAI to release 4.5.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.