Cleantech subsidies are a minuscule fraction of one percent of the fossil-fuel subsidy amounts referred to.
Mostly false False in substance, right in a detail.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
What would count as true or false
Judged as of 2014-01-14. The claim compares U.S. cleantech subsidies with a figure of $502 billion in fossil-fuel subsidies (a widely cited global estimate, e.g. from the IEA or IMF). True: credible figures show annual cleantech or renewable subsidies were far below 1% of $502 billion, i.e. well under about $5 billion. Mostly true: cleantech subsidies were under 1% of the total, but not a 'minuscule fraction' of 1%. Mixed: the result depends heavily on the definitions or bases used for the comparison. Mostly false: cleantech subsidies were above 1% of the stated amount, e.g. US renewable subsidies of about $10-15 billion a year (EIA). The claim then rests on a real gap but overstates it, or compares mismatched bases (US versus global). False: cleantech subsidies were comparable to or larger than the stated fossil-fuel subsidy amount.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 Total energy subsidies decline since 2010, with changes in support across fuel types - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) · 13 March 2015
“Wind subsidies increased by less than 10%, going from $5.5 billion in 2010 to $5.9 billion in 2013.”
-
E2 Total energy subsidies decline since 2010, with changes in support across fuel types - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) · 13 March 2015
“However, solar subsidies increased the most, both in absolute and percentage terms, going from $1.1 billion to $5.3 billion in 2013, with declining solar costs and state-level policies also supporting additional growth.”
-
E3 Total energy subsidies decline since 2010, with changes in support across fuel types - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) · 13 March 2015
“Between FY 2010 and FY 2013, the total value of direct federal financial interventions and subsidies in energy markets decreased 23% from $38.0 billion to $29.3 billion dollars, reflecting changes in both the type of subsidies offered and fuels that received support.”
-
E4 Total energy subsidies decline since 2010, with changes in support across fuel types - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) · 13 March 2015
“Federal subsidy support for fossil fuels declined from almost $4 billion in FY 2010 to $3.4 billion in FY 2013.”
Reasoning
EIA puts U.S. federal wind subsidies at $5.9 billion in FY2013 (E1) and solar subsidies at $5.3 billion (E2). Together that is about $11.2 billion, roughly 2.2% of $502 billion. That is above 1%, not a tiny fraction of 1%. EIA puts U.S. federal fossil-fuel subsidies at $3.4 billion in FY2013 (E4), a U.S. figure rather than the global $502 billion estimate the criteria use for the comparison. The criteria call that comparing mismatched bases, and they put renewable subsidies of about $10–15 billion a year in the mostly-false range.
Cite this claim
Vinod Khosla, “Cleantech subsidies are a minuscule fraction of one percent of the fossil-fuel subsidy amounts referred to.” (said 14 January 2014). Verdict: mostly false. Reliability API, claim c_f62dd61ca2b0, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_f62dd61ca2b0
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Vinod Khosla
-
Mostly true
“And massive outcomes for @khoslaventures and others but more importantly a big change in the devops landscape.”
GitLab's outcome produced massive financial returns for Khosla Ventures and other investors.
-
Resolved true
“AMZN price declined 90% next few years!”
Amazon's stock price declined 90% over the few years following the dot-com era.
-
Resolved true
“What it is today wasn't part of the plan when we originally invested.”
-
Mostly true
“misses many compelling ones like Rubrik which is younger and growing much faster than Cohesity!”
Rubrik is younger than Cohesity and is growing much faster than Cohesity.
-
Mostly false
“Weeks before your program aired, View secured an additional $100 million in private funding to ramp production at its Mississippi-based manufacturing facility, which is creating scores of new…”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.