GitLab's outcome produced massive financial returns for Khosla Ventures and other investors.
Mostly true True in substance, wrong in a detail.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
Judged as of 2021-10-20 (GitLab's IPO, 14 October 2021). True: Khosla Ventures was a significant GitLab investor, and its stake (plus those of other investors) was worth many times its invested capital at or around the IPO valuation (roughly $11-16 billion), per S-1 ownership filings or credible reporting. Mostly true: large returns are shown, but Khosla's stake or multiple was smaller than 'massive' implies, though still substantial. Mixed: Khosla's returns were moderate (e.g. under 3x), while other investors' returns were large. Mostly false: Khosla was a minor holder and its return was small. False: Khosla Ventures did not hold a GitLab stake, or the investment was not worth more than its cost at the time.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (3)
-
E1 Which VCs are set to make a killing in GitLab's IPO | TechCrunch TechCrunch · 20 September 2021
“Khosla: 19,028,320 Class B shares, or 14.1% of that equity class.”
-
E2 Which VCs are set to make a killing in GitLab's IPO | TechCrunch TechCrunch · 20 September 2021
“At a $6 billion price point, Khosla could net north of $1 billion. At a $10 billion price tag, the number scales materially.”
-
E3 Which VCs are set to make a killing in GitLab's IPO | TechCrunch TechCrunch · 20 September 2021
“Khosla Ventures led the company’s early rounds before GV, Goldman Sachs and ICONIQ Capital took the baton.”
Reasoning
TechCrunch reports that Khosla Ventures led GitLab's early rounds (E3) and held 19,028,320 Class B shares, or 14.1% of that class (E1). TechCrunch estimated before the IPO that the stake could net over $1 billion at a $6 billion valuation, and materially more at $10 billion (E2). The IPO valuation range in the criteria is above both figures. The evidence does not state Khosla's invested capital, so 'many times its cost' is a strong inference rather than a stated figure. That gap supports mostly true rather than true.
Cite this claim
Vinod Khosla, “GitLab's outcome produced massive financial returns for Khosla Ventures and other investors.” (said 20 October 2021). Verdict: mostly true. Reliability API, claim c_802559831015, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_802559831015
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Vinod Khosla
-
Resolved true
“AMZN price declined 90% next few years!”
Amazon's stock price declined 90% over the few years following the dot-com era.
-
Resolved true
“What it is today wasn't part of the plan when we originally invested.”
-
Mostly true
“misses many compelling ones like Rubrik which is younger and growing much faster than Cohesity!”
Rubrik is younger than Cohesity and is growing much faster than Cohesity.
-
Mostly false
“Weeks before your program aired, View secured an additional $100 million in private funding to ramp production at its Mississippi-based manufacturing facility, which is creating scores of new…”
-
Mostly false
“Cleantech subsidies are a miniscule fraction of one-percent of these amounts.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.