The projections being discussed assume a fixed rate of growth of 3.5% per year for the next fifty years.
Resolved false The record shows it did not happen or was not so.
Factual: Statements about the present or the past, checked against the record: did they hold up?
The second judge would not resolve this claim; the verdict shown is the first judge's.
What would count as true or false
Judge against the Social Security Trustees' projections current in January 2001 (the 2000 Trustees Report, intermediate assumptions), or other official Social Security projections if the context points to them. True: the projections assumed a fixed growth rate of 3.5% per year over roughly 50 years for the economic measure Kurzweil refers to. Mostly true: the assumed rate was about 3.5% (within about 0.2 points) or nearly constant over the period. Mostly false: a 3.5% figure exists but applies to a different variable or a shorter period, or the rate was not fixed. False: the assumed growth rates were materially different, for example well below 3.5% and declining.
Set before the research began.
Evidence (4)
-
E1 2001 OASDI Trustees Report Social Security Administration, Office of the Chief Actuary · 19 March 2001
“For alternative II, the average annual growth in real GDP is projected to be 2.4 percent over the short-range projection period (2000-10), a slower rate than the 3.1 percent average observed over the historical 30-year period (1969-99).”
-
E2 2001 OASDI Trustees Report Social Security Administration, Office of the Chief Actuary · 19 March 2001
“By 2075, the growth in real GDP slows to about 1.6 percent, due to the assumed ultimate percent changes of 0.2, 1.5, and -0.1 for total employment, productivity, and average hours worked, respectively.”
-
E3 2001 OASDI Trustees Report Social Security Administration, Office of the Chief Actuary · 19 March 2001
“Thus, the assumed ultimate annual growth rates in average covered wages are 3.8, 4.3, and 4.8 percent for alternatives I, II, and III, respectively.”
-
E4 Out of the Box - The American Prospect The American Prospect · 19 December 2001
“Under the actuary's current assumptions, the U.S. economy will grow at an annual rate of only 1.6 percent in the long term.”
Reasoning
The Trustees' intermediate (alternative II) projections from early 2001 assume real GDP growth of 2.4 percent for 2000-10, slowing to about 1.6 percent by 2075 (E1, E2). This is well below 3.5 percent and declining, not fixed. An independent account later in 2001 likewise describes the actuary's long-term growth assumption as 1.6 percent (E4). The only figure near 3.5 percent is the 4.3 percent ultimate nominal covered-wage growth, which is a different variable (E3); the evidence comes from the 2001 report, issued two months after the claim, rather than the 2000 report named in the criteria.
Cite this claim
Ray Kurzweil, “The projections being discussed assume a fixed rate of growth of 3.5% per year for the next fifty years.” (said January 2001). Verdict: resolved false. Reliability API, claim c_e05712154e68, method 0.1.0+28da144b, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_e05712154e68
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More factual claims by Ray Kurzweil
-
Mixed
“more and more people from more and more backgrounds are participating, which didn’t used to.”
-
Mostly true
“These new forms of solar and wind don’t use any of that.”
New forms of solar and wind do not use oil and coal or add carbon dioxide.
-
Resolved true
“We actually have 10,000 times more sunlight that falls on the Earth than we need to meet all of our energy needs.”
10,000 times more sunlight falls on Earth than needed to meet all energy needs.
-
Mostly true
“we make 10 times as much in constant dollars as we did 100 years ago.”
People today earn about 10 times as much in constant dollars as 100 years ago.
-
Mostly false
“That was not true a year ago. But that’s true today.”
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.