An AI might make a huge jump in intelligence after reaching some threshold of criticality.
Unresolvable The public record could not settle it.
Prediction: Statements about events outside the person's control, checked once they fell due: did they come true?
Reasoning
A 'might' about a future threshold jump with no horizon.
Cite this claim
Eliezer Yudkowsky, “An AI might make a huge jump in intelligence after reaching some threshold of criticality.” (said 2008). Verdict: unresolvable. Reliability API, claim c_d45a0a4e31c1, method 0.1.0+c876030c, dataset release v1.1.2. https://epistacklabs.com/claims/c_d45a0a4e31c1
This claim is in dataset release v1.1.2, with the same verdict.
Reply to this claim
More prediction claims by Eliezer Yudkowsky
-
Mostly false
“So probably Paul’s going to win, but slight moral victory.”
-
Mixed
“Beating GPT-4 on GI just forces OpenAI to release 4.5.”
-
Resolved false
“The current crop of people will not try it.”
-
Resolved true
“Alignment will not be solved in a few years.”
-
Resolved true
“even if GPT-5 doesn’t end the world, which I agree is like more than 50% of where my probability mass lies”
GPT-5 will not end the world, with more than 50% of Yudkowsky's probability on that outcome.
Verdicts are made automatically; how verdicts are made.